Potential Interest
What's YOUR criteria in finding a suitable BF/GF/spouse?
Using the simple tools of science, the great Professor Wang is able to illustrate exactly what you look for in the opposite (hopefully) sex!
We begin with the different fields of Looks, Mannerisms, Personality, Intelligence, Religion and Spark. These all affect the Potential Interest you have in somebody as a mate.
Looks are self-explanatory. Take supermodel Giselle Bundchen and Lydia Sum from the channel 5 smash 'Living With Lydia'. Who would bring more lustful happiness to your life? Who would be much more visually tolerable and thereby more 'activating'? WHY OF COURSE its LYDIA SUM!! She embodies beauty in all senses of the typical Singaporean, and is definitely more pleasing to the eye with her gaping jaw and ahlian eyes. (To have avoided feeling weird and disgusted, you should have just stopped reading after 'Looks are self-explanatory')
Mannerisms are much harder to define. This broad spectra includes hygiene, idiosyncracies and pet peeves that may or may not be good. There's nose-digging, stalking, stuttering, stalking, biting your fingernails and DID I MENTION STALKING? There are cute ones too, such as wincing and giggling and looking plain good. Oh wait..
Personality may be about character traits such as magnanimity and gregariousness, but we know it's really about how many presents and kisses she/he showers upon you.
Intelligence is once again, self-explanatory, but only if you possess enough Intelligence.
Religion is trickier. The level you desire would depend on your own religion (or lack thereof, you sinners!). Based on this, you may want your spouse to be equally salvaged as you, or equally headed for the Great Fiery Hole in the Earth. JOKING!
Finally, there is the Spark or connectivity. How well do you click with the person? Can you maintain a conversation that doesn't depend on monosyllabic responses (unless its the fabulous sex of course)? All in all Spark is the hardest to attain.
In order for a anyone to even ponder the potential for a relationship, these 6 attributes must meet the minimum criteria in the person of interest:
Graph of Potential Interest against Relationship Coordinate
A deficiency in any one of these criteria would result in an inability to reach activation energy, and there is no further hope. If you're already in a relationship when you discover this lacking.. Well good luck.
Take Spark for instance. If somebody scores fullmarks on everything else but there is no Spark between you, he/she will forever remain nothing more than a crush/eye candy!
However, once met, the Potential Iinterest will peak and it'll all be downhill from then :) (downhill meaning easy and fulfilling, not a downward spiral into oblivion.. I think)
So, what is YOUR relationship criteria? I think i know mine.
Note: Thanks to Pam for inspiration in this entry!
Please go to PostSecret.com.
Sacrificing DotA for ChemCarboxTut to... Shorty (Put It On the Floor) - Chingy ft Busta Rhymes
Using the simple tools of science, the great Pro
We begin with the different fields of Looks, Mannerisms, Personality, Intelligence, Religion and Spark. These all affect the Potential Interest you have in somebody as a mate.
Looks are self-explanatory. Take supermodel Giselle Bundchen and Lydia Sum from the channel 5 smash 'Living With Lydia'. Who would bring more lustful happiness to your life? Who would be much more visually tolerable and thereby more 'activating'? WHY OF COURSE its LYDIA SUM!! She embodies beauty in all senses of the typical Singaporean, and is definitely more pleasing to the eye with her gaping jaw and ahlian eyes. (To have avoided feeling weird and disgusted, you should have just stopped reading after 'Looks are self-explanatory')
Mannerisms are much harder to define. This broad spectra includes hygiene, idiosyncracies and pet peeves that may or may not be good. There's nose-digging, stalking, stuttering, stalking, biting your fingernails and DID I MENTION STALKING? There are cute ones too, such as wincing and giggling and looking plain good. Oh wait..
Personality may be about character traits such as magnanimity and gregariousness, but we know it's really about how many presents and kisses she/he showers upon you.
Intelligence is once again, self-explanatory, but only if you possess enough Intelligence.
Religion is trickier. The level you desire would depend on your own religion (or lack thereof, you sinners!). Based on this, you may want your spouse to be equally salvaged as you, or equally headed for the Great Fiery Hole in the Earth. JOKING!
Finally, there is the Spark or connectivity. How well do you click with the person? Can you maintain a conversation that doesn't depend on monosyllabic responses (unless its the fabulous sex of course)? All in all Spark is the hardest to attain.
In order for a anyone to even ponder the potential for a relationship, these 6 attributes must meet the minimum criteria in the person of interest:
Graph of Potential Interest against Relationship Coordinate
A deficiency in any one of these criteria would result in an inability to reach activation energy, and there is no further hope. If you're already in a relationship when you discover this lacking.. Well good luck.
Take Spark for instance. If somebody scores fullmarks on everything else but there is no Spark between you, he/she will forever remain nothing more than a crush/eye candy!
However, once met, the Potential Iinterest will peak and it'll all be downhill from then :) (downhill meaning easy and fulfilling, not a downward spiral into oblivion.. I think)
So, what is YOUR relationship criteria? I think i know mine.
Note: Thanks to Pam for inspiration in this entry!
Please go to PostSecret.com.
Sacrificing DotA for ChemCarboxTut to... Shorty (Put It On the Floor) - Chingy ft Busta Rhymes
Came, Saw and Conquered by dw 10:36 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home